[1+1=2]
OneAndOneIs2

Tue, May 01, 2007

[Link][Icon]Damned to Google Hell

Or, "Cursed to have to actually pay for advertising"?

Slashdot links to a story in which a few businessmen complain that, following their websites being mislabelled by Google's algorithms as spam-type sites, they lost huge chunks of revenue as they ceased to show up on the first few pages of Google searches.

Maybe it's just me, but I find it hard to have sympathy for these guys. In this context, Google is essentially providing free advertising. All they're seeing when Google reassigns their pages are the effects of having a business that nobody knows about because it doesn't advertise.

They could reclaim their "As seen on Google's first page" status easily, by spending the cash to buy an advertising slot on it. The people in the article sell diamonds. Plugging "diamonds" in as a search term yields the following ten results (using google.co.uk):

  • Wikipedia
  • Diamonds.com
  • Original-diamonds.com
  • approveddiamonds.com
  • 4csdiamonds.com
  • diamondgeezer.com
  • qualitydiamonds.co.uk
  • thediamondjeweller.co.uk
  • cooldiamonds.com
  • dejoria.co.uk

However, the top and side of the page, where the adverts are, link to:

  • CoolDiamonds.com
  • jf-k.com/diamonds
  • purelydiamonds.co.uk
  • bluenile.co.uk
  • diamondgeezer.com
  • RageStones.com
  • zsdiamonds.com
  • 77diamonds.com
  • diamondsonweb.com
  • TheDiamondStore.co.uk

Only two are on both lists. So all the other diamond sellers in the second list are probably doing a pretty good trade courtesy of links from Google, even though they aren't in the first page of results.

I'm sure the guys in the first list aren't complaining that they're getting the same amount of exposure for free, but their place is (as Forbes reports) considerably less secure.

If your business relies on people seeing you when they do a Google search, perhaps you should consider actually paying to make sure they DO see you?

Failing that, you could at least not whine about Google damaging your business when they stop giving you a top-spot for free.

Having said that, I'm frequently on the first page of Google's results, particularly if the search is something along the lines of "linux windows", so:

>--- This Space for rent --<

[Smiley]

Comments:

Comment from: hari [Member] Email · http://hari.literaryforums.org
First, google is too powerful as a search engine. It's now become virtually the #1 gateway to the internet by a distance.

I agree that they are a free service, but they're a lot more than just a free service - because they happen to be google.

Manipulating google results is very difficult and I wouldn't recommend it to anybody. So these people have themselves to blame if they did so. Too bad, you cannot merely rely on an internet search engine if you're in business.
PermalinkPermalink 02/05/07 @ 02:15
Comment from: DotCom [Visitor] Email
Manipulating your page to achieve better search results is a dangerous trick ... they gambled and lost. Buy your results or quit whining.

Besides, in the end it is the strength of you product/service and not your advertising anyway, thats just frosting.
PermalinkPermalink 06/05/07 @ 14:06

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Categories

August 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Search

Misc

XML Feeds

What is this?
eXTReMe Tracker

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Valid CSS!

[Valid RSS feed]

powered by
b2evolution

blank