| « Great. Just great. | To the surprise of. . . » |
Tue, May 01, 2007
![[Icon]](rsc/img/chain_link.gif)
Or, "Cursed to have to actually pay for advertising"?
Slashdot links to a story in which a few businessmen complain that, following their websites being mislabelled by Google's algorithms as spam-type sites, they lost huge chunks of revenue as they ceased to show up on the first few pages of Google searches.
Maybe it's just me, but I find it hard to have sympathy for these guys. In this context, Google is essentially providing free advertising. All they're seeing when Google reassigns their pages are the effects of having a business that nobody knows about because it doesn't advertise.
They could reclaim their "As seen on Google's first page" status easily, by spending the cash to buy an advertising slot on it. The people in the article sell diamonds. Plugging "diamonds" in as a search term yields the following ten results (using google.co.uk):
However, the top and side of the page, where the adverts are, link to:
Only two are on both lists. So all the other diamond sellers in the second list are probably doing a pretty good trade courtesy of links from Google, even though they aren't in the first page of results.
I'm sure the guys in the first list aren't complaining that they're getting the same amount of exposure for free, but their place is (as Forbes reports) considerably less secure.
If your business relies on people seeing you when they do a Google search, perhaps you should consider actually paying to make sure they DO see you?
Failing that, you could at least not whine about Google damaging your business when they stop giving you a top-spot for free.
Having said that, I'm frequently on the first page of Google's results, particularly if the search is something along the lines of "linux windows", so:
>--- This Space for rent --<
![]()
Creative Hedgehog
I played this game with a group of girls aged 12-14, and it was a real hit.
I got the idea from Group Games.com, but modified it a little to prevent cheating.
You need a group of people- I had 10, probably 15 and 5 are the upper and lower limits respectively. You [...]
03/02/10 - telephone charades
Hari's corner
The next episode of my comic
05/02/10 - The Legalease - Episode 6
Place of Stuff
But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.
In the first part, we saw how God placed temptation in the way of Adam and Eve, and then punished them when they fell for it. I think that this was the first "dick move” [...]
02/02/10 - The Bible ? What Adam Did Next
Advice From a Single Girl
The world I live in inside my head is pretty darn hilarious most of the time. And many of my closest friends appreciate my slightly silly sense of humour.I have to remind myself, however, that my "tee hee, that was funny" in my head doesn't always translate well out in the real world.A good example of this?I made a funny (to me) joke in the store the other day about some toasters I was looking
31/12/69 - Inside Thoughts
Nation
 
This was possibly the most ridiculous show I have seen in a long time and I can get Sky 1 I know ridiculous. It could be summed up in three sentences Do you know what's in your cereal? Want to? Read the label. Instead it went on for a hour about how evil the cereal [...]
27/10/09 - Dispatches ? do you know what?s in your breakfast? (warning...
Blogroll generated by MagpieRSS
![[Links]](http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/skins/112/rsc/img/chain_link.gif)
Dominic was watching "Temple of Doom" and was struck by the question: How would Kali, six-armed Goddess of death, do the macarena?
07/02/10
![]()
I last listened to:
The Offspring - She's Got Issues
Most recent photo:
Submersible houseboat