[1+1=2]

OneAndOneIs2

« Readinghahahahahaha »

Mon, Feb 02, 2009

[Icon][Icon]Snowflakes

• Post categories: Omni, My Life

A lot of them started falling from the sky yesterday, and for the first time in ages we have a half-decent layer of snow. Schools have closed and I'm not planning on trying to drive anywhere any time soon.

And everybody knows that snowflakes are all different and all six-sided, but possibly not WHY this is so..

Snow

So. First off, the six-sides. This is because water is made up of H2O - Two hydrogens joined to one Oxygen.

Typically, in this kind of chemical, you expect a linear molecule - the two Hydrogens get as far apart as possible. But because of Oxygen's electron arrangement, it acts like it has FOUR atoms joined to it, which gives you a tetrahedral shape. With two missing points. i.e. a bent molecule.

water

And when these stick together, they stick together in a hexagonal pattern:

Ice

And that hexagonal pattern at the molecular level carries right on through to the snowflake structure. Hence the six points.

So that leaves why they're symmetrical and different. This is all down to how ice forms differently under different conditions. Humidity, temperature, and pressure all play a part. Under some conditions, you get hexagonal plates. Under others, needles. Under yet others, branching 'feathers'.

So if a flake were to form in just one of those conditions, you'd get a plain hexagon; a plain six-pointed star; or six feathers joined together.

But instead, the flakes form slowly and swirl through the clouds, and so experience many different conditions. And so they form differently, but because each branch experiences the same conditions at the same time, they form symmetrically.

If you're interested, this is quite a good diagram once you work it out:

Graph

And that's why snowflakes are the way they are. The first snowflake looks like it started out in hexagonal conditions, then sectored plates, then dendrites.

Simple as that!

4 comments

Jess
Comment from: Jess [Visitor] · http://www.dontbeknotty.com
This is fun!
02/02/09 @ 22:12
oneandoneis2
Comment from: oneandoneis2 [Member] · http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/
I agree, but only because I didn't have to try driving anywhere this morning ;o)
02/02/09 @ 23:56
titanium_geek
Comment from: titanium_geek [Visitor] · http://www.creativehedgehog.com
my question is, how do we KNOW that they are all different? We assume that they are because it is hard to replicate conditions, but how do we know that there is no possibility of producing an identical snowflake?
03/02/09 @ 01:18
oneandoneis2
Comment from: oneandoneis2 [Member] · http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/
It all depends on how you define "identical"

If you stick to a simple definition like "A typical human can't tell the difference by looking" then there's plenty of identical snowflakes.

But if you mean genuinely, truly, 100% identical.. then that just doesn't happen in nature. A snowflake may be tiny, but it's made up of billions upon billions of water molecules. Every single one of those being in the exact same position, centered upon a nucleus that is also completely identical?

Worse, the atoms themselves aren't uniform: There are isotopes to account for. One in 6500 Hydrogens atoms is actually a Deuterium. For a snowflake to be identical, not only every would molecule have to be identically placed, but every atom would have to be the right type within that molecule.

With the possible exception of nanotechnology structures that were literally built atom-by-atom, you aren't going to find ANY truly identical pairs of objects in this universe. There's nothing remarkable about snowflakes being unique, but two things being naturally indistinguishable? THAT would be something to see.
03/02/09 @ 11:29

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)
 

[Links][icon] My links

[Icon][Icon] Hmm.. new look for twitter? I hope it gets less "Ick! Change! Put it back!" nonsense than Facebook..
08/02/12

[Icon][Icon] Facebook Syndication Error
09/02/12

[Icon][Icon] I last listened to:
Johann Pachelbel - Canon in D major

[Icon][Icon] Most recent photo:
Submersible houseboat

[Icon][Icon]About Me

[Icon][Icon]About this blog

[Icon][Icon]My LQ profile

[Icon][Icon]My /. profile

[Icon][Icon]My Wishlist

[Icon]MyCommerce

[FSF Associate Member]


February 2012
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29        

Search

User tools

XML Feeds

eXTReMe Tracker

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Valid CSS!

[Valid RSS feed]

powered by b2evolution