[1+1=2]

OneAndOneIs2

« New Year's eve moonWindows 7 was my idea »

Sat, Jan 02, 2010

[Icon][Icon]Pointless airport security

• Post categories: Omni, Rant, In The News, Technology, Science:ItWorks

So we've all seen the news that a wannabe terrorist managed to get a bomb onto a plane. And there's a lot of fuss being made about how he shouldn't have been able to manage it, and we have to tighten security and do all kinds of body scans and various other things to make sure bombs don't get onto planes.

. . .

So it makes me wonder: Do the Powers That Be genuinely think that all this security nonsense really can make it impossible for a determined terrorist to blow up a plane, or are they doing all of it as a big placebo effect to make people think that a flight is sure to be safe?

Because here's the thing: Any half-decent scientist could take down a plane without taking anything onto a plane that wasn't allowed to be there.

I know people make this kind of claim all the time, that through some unspecified means, knowledgeable and determined people could blow up the plane they were on somehow. So I'll take it one step further, and actually prove it.

So: The problem is how to get an explosive on a plane without smuggling on anything that you aren't allowed to take.

The solution is to buy a business class ticket. Hey, it's your last ever flight, it might as well be comfortable...

Business class seats have a power supply to allow you to use your laptop during the long and boring hours on the plane. Typically, this will be something like the EmPower system, which delivers up to 75 watts of Direct Current.

One watt = 1 joule/second, so 75 watts = 4500 joules/minute

A flight from London to California, as I know from long experience, takes around eleven hours. To make the maths easy, let's say that you have ten hours to make your explosive.

4500 joules/minute = 270,000 joules/hour = 2,700,000 joules/flight

If you're a normal person, at this point your eyes are starting to glaze, because a joule is very abstract.

If you diet a lot, it might be helpful to explain that this is nearly 650 thousand calories.

If that still doesn't mean much, let's put it into explosive terms: It's about equal to 650 grams of TNT. That's a bit more than four hand grenades.

Yep. The energy of four hand grenades, on-tap from the laptop charger.

Of course, you've got to collect and store that power over the course of the flight... using nothing that can't be taken onto the plane.

Well, that's easy. Water can be taken onto the plane, and in fact will be supplied to you for free on demand by the flight attendants. And water can be broken down by direct current into hydrogen and oxygen - ever do electrolysis at school as a kid..? A very explosive combination. Hydrogen alone is pretty impressive (Remember the Hindenberg?) but when it's pre-mixed with the ideal ratio of Oxygen...

You can see in the vid how Hydrogen gives a flame but Hydrogen+Oxygen gives an explosion.

So the laptop charger will turn water into an explosive gas. Yay! And you're also allowed to take a big bag onto the flight - 23 x 36 x 56cm (Call it one foot by one foot by two foot) which a small amount of preparation beforehand could easily make into an airtight collector of your gases. And since transatlantic flights give you other things, like blankets, you can be fairly confident that you can make sure nobody will see that you've got your power cable running down to the carry-on bag at your feet...

All it needs once you're ready to go is a single spark to ignite the mix. And that's easy enough to make if you've got a supply of electricity.

So there you go. A bit of preparation and some high-school science, and anyone who wants to can get a significant explosive onto a plane. So long as they're ok with being on it when it goes down, of course...

Never mind that all the airport security is a huge placebo because people keep smuggling stuff past it. It's also fundamentally worthless because all manner of harmless things can be made lethal with a little bit of knowledge. Transatlantic flights also tend to serve meals that include a couple of bread rolls and some salt to go on the food. I know somebody who used to blow up locks by soaking bread in salt water, stuffing it into the keyhole, and passing a current through it.

Yep. Bread can go bang too.

I'm not sure what the security is like when it comes to electronics, but I can't imagine it would be that hard to sneak a large array of capacitors onto a plane disguised as a harmless gadget. Charge up those capacitors for a while, release the charge in one big spark, you could probably get an EMP big enough to take out some of the flight electronics.

All this airport security kinda reminds me of DRM on DVDs and games. A huge inconvenience to all the honest people and no real barrier to the bad guys.

There *is* a need for better security on flights, make no mistake. But ever-more-invasive body scans and stricter rules about what can and can't go on are not it. Perhaps, just for once, we could try applying intelligence to the problem..?

3 comments

sinn3r
Comment from: sinn3r [Member] Email · http://sinn3r.org/
Nice article. I am sure they'll sue you for this "Howto be a bad guy"-thing...;)

But that rigid airship was the Hindenburg- not Berg. :)
02/01/10 @ 14:03
Yuta
Comment from: Yuta [Visitor]
Good! There is indeed a solution much better than endless stupid scans. What if the very possibility of communication between passengers and pilots is eliminated? Say by few meters of technical stuff and a few solid walls. It may be a bit like Linux - instead of giving everyone on a plane a chance to affect it's flight and possible destination (i.e. root rights) just cut those rights of passengers down to nothing. Sure, a knowledgeable and determined man will still be able to blow the plane. But I suppose no purpose will be served this way.
11/01/10 @ 14:45
oneandoneis2
Comment from: oneandoneis2 [Member] · http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/
I have often wondered why, following the whole 9/11 thing, they didn't put up a barrier between pilots & passengers.. it seems such a simple thing to do.

There's other things they could do to improve security, too...

11/01/10 @ 17:17

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)
 

[icon] Blogroll

[icon] Creative Hedgehog
La parte A se refiere solamente a las dos novelas estudiadas. La parte A debe ser preparada después de leer la primera mitad de la novela y contestar las siguientes preguntas: ¿te está gustando la novela/película o no, y por qué? No me gusta la novela. Las personajes que puedes gustar son superficiales, o hacen [...][Link to post]06/08/10 - SPN3730 diario: Pascual Duarte parte A

[icon] Hari's corner
Why being bi-lingual has its advantages[Link to post]10/08/10 - Being bi-lingual has its advantages

[icon] Place of Stuff
Isn't this exciting? We're out of the tedium of Genesis (world created, man falls, many people live and die. Oh, and attempted forced buggery and a spot of incest). We're into Exodus now; the Bible has got going, that tricky first chapter is out of the way and the real action can start! When the [...]

[Link to post]
03/08/10 - The Bible ? On The Waterfront

[icon] Advice From a Single Girl

I was giddy and hopeful when I first met Cary and spent a brief amount of time with him.

The week after that I was happily high on the idea of what could be, the possibility of getting to know someone interesting and intriguing, the wide open potential of what could be.

And I wanted to tell my friends all about him and what had, and hadn't happened, but I also wanted to keep it to myself, sealed safely in the happy bubble that was floating inside me. So I talked to some close friends about him, told them he lived in Vancouver and they, meaning well, told me quite firmly that they would not allow me to go through another long distance relationship. That I shouldn't even consider it.

My bubble had been burst.

I was completely deflated. Hurt. Let down.

I talked to C-Dawg, a sad tinge to the story now that I'd been told it could. . . should never work out.

"Vancouver?" she said, her voice somewhere between amused and incredulous. "That's not long distance! Get serious. Go for it."

And I let my bubble maybe start to re-inflate. Cautiously. Maybe just a little.

Then I talked to my friend about Cary. She said good things.

Maybe there was reason to be hopefully optimistic. Maybe it was ok to be a little girly and dreamy over what-ifs.

I went for a walk with S. We had life to catch up on.

Life including Cary and the story that still makes me smile.

She encouraged me to get his email, which I did, and then she went home and tried to find out what she could about him.

See, I'm not on Facebook. (No, really.) But S is, and in the small world way that Facebook seems to work, she found that Cary and she had a mutual friend and so she looked him up for me. (The modern background check.)

You can sometimes tell a lot about a person by what they put on their Facebook, she cautioned me. Sometimes.

How old is he?

Me: I don't know.

Is he a smoker?

Me: Um, I don't know? (God, I hope not)

Could he maybe be a little bit immature?

Me: I don't know. I suppose.

Well, he seems like a good guy. Cute. Interesting. I'd say he was my type, you know. (We laugh, we already know we share similar excellent taste in men.)

"I say go for it." She says, "just be aware that he's human. Not perfect."

I don't want to hear it.

Don't want to know the reality of him.

Find myself running away from all the what might have been's towards it'll never work what what I thinking's.

It's all or nothing. Perfect or awful. It'll work or it'll be a disaster.

And I realize that my bubble, the one that's been growing and floating inside me will burst on its own, without anyone's help if I get too far into imagining just how great Cary is, how great we'd be together, how perfectly perfect it all will be.

I'm Icarus. My friends don't want me flying too close to the sun.

But I like the feeling.

I like the soaring giddiness of how utterly fantastic this thing I've found will be.

Every single time I meet someone I like that feeling.

And I ride it higher and higher until I'm flapping my bare arms, feathers fallen into the sea and the crash is coming, the relationship splintering and I'm left staring at the brokenness wondering how on earth I could have been so wrong again.

The extremes are familiar. Addictive perhaps.

But I'm trying to learn to ride in the middle.

Safer. A shorter distance to fall.

A smaller bubble to burst.

Expectations that can be met and exceeded.

A safe, yet joyful and giddy flight. Wings intact.
[Link to post]
03/09/10 - Icarus

[icon] Nation
&#160; This was possibly the most ridiculous show I have seen in a long time and I can get Sky 1 I know ridiculous. It could be summed up in three sentences Do you know what's in your cereal? Want to? Read the label. Instead it went on for a hour about how evil the [...][Link to post]27/10/09 - Dispatches ? do you know what?s in your breakfast? (warning...

Blogroll generated by MagpieRSS

[Links][icon] My links

[Icon][Icon] Strange, how the only people who ever seem to complain that Linux sucks or doesn't work well are people who don't like using the CLI...
03/09/10

[Icon][Icon] Dominic tried to explain how circular references can cause a memory leak to a colleague this morning, and got told off for not working. Apparently, the analogy of a madman shooting anybody who isn't being pointed at by somebody else was NOT the boss-safe way to go..
01/09/10

[Icon][Icon] I last listened to:
The Offspring - She's Got Issues

[Icon][Icon] Most recent photo:
Submersible houseboat

[Icon][Icon]About Me

[Icon][Icon]About this blog

[Icon][Icon]My LQ profile

[Icon][Icon]My /. profile

[Icon][Icon]My Wishlist

[Icon]MyCommerce

[FSF Associate Member]


September 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Search

User tools

XML Feeds

eXTReMe Tracker

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Valid CSS!

[Valid RSS feed]

powered by b2evolution free blog software