| « Temping | PHP.. why the hate? » |
Thu, Mar 11, 2010
![[Icon]](rsc/img/chain_link.gif)
Somebody called Steve Barnes has written a piece for Times Union about an American politician trying to introduce a bill to completely ban all salt in restaurant cooking.
Right from the first couple of paragraphs, you're left in no doubt that this bill is disliked by Mr Barnes:
A new bill in the state Assembly would ruin restaurant food and baked goods as we know them.
In a deeply misguided gesture that is also an abuse of the legislative process, a New York City Assemblyman is pushing a nanny-state bill
Don't hold back there, Steve, tell us what you REALLY think! :o) (There's also a picture of a dunce cap in the main body of the text)
Don't get me wrong, I completely agree with him: the bill is insane and the dangers of salt - an absolutely vital substance we can't live without - are hugely overstated, mainly by the writers of faddy diet books.
But in a world that usually insists on at least some pretence of balanced, unbiased journalism, I found this to be a very unusual piece: Well-researched and completely biased. Those two don't often go together.
I'm impressed :o)
![[Links]](http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/skins/112/rsc/img/chain_link.gif)
Hmm.. new look for twitter? I hope it gets less "Ick! Change! Put it back!" nonsense than Facebook..
08/02/12
Facebook Syndication Error
09/02/12
![]()
I last listened to:
Johann Pachelbel - Canon in D major
Most recent photo:
Submersible houseboat