[1+1=2]

OneAndOneIs2

« WeakCar trouble, and all that Jazz »

Thu, Feb 24, 2011

[Icon][Icon]Brain clock

• Post categories: Omni, Science:ItWorks

They say you can't beat the clock.

Your brain has a clock, and you can change its speed fairly easily. Which can give the illusion that you can, in fact, escape its influence. The truth is, though, that it controls almost every move you make.

I imagine you're familiar with the old childhood favourite of "Pat your head and rub your tummy" which demonstrates how hard it is to get your limbs to do two completely different things.

But that can be overcome with just co-ordination. Getting your limbs out of synch rhythmically is waaaaay harder.

Try this: First, alternate tapping on the desk with your hands: Left, right, left, right

Easy, right?

Second, try going slightly out of synch by using a 2:1 ratio: Left, left, right, left, left, right

Also totally simple.

Now, stick with a 2:1 but this time in-step: Left, BOTH, left, BOTH, left, BOTH

This is also easy, but I'm willing to bet that you're having to think about this rather more than the previous two steps.

The reason? The way your brain dealt with the first two steps was to tie into its 'clock': Every 'beat' triggered a single movement, and it simply alternated which side it sent the movement to. Even a simple 2:1 sequence was just a slight variation on the theme.

But now you're doing two different actions: Your brain's not running the "single tap, single tap, single tap" 'program' and just alternating sides: It's alternating between two different programs: "single tap, double tap, single tap, double tap" and that makes it trickier.

But here's where it gets really hard: Try and get your hands out of synch, with one tapping fast and one tapping slowly.

I'm willing to bet you can't. Sure, it might seem like you can if you don't pay close attention. But EVERY time your 'slow' hand taps, it'll do so BETWEEN two taps of the 'fast' hand. When I try to just tap one hand fast and the other slow, I fall into a natural 4-then-1 ratio.

Try getting your slow hand so it's moving constantly up and down, just slower than the fast hand, so it can't sneak in between the other hand's tapping. Even then, I bet you'll still be starting and stopping between the fast hand's taps.

If you manage it, well done. If not, don't worry, I can barely do it myself. But here's one virtually nobody can do: Completely asynchronous tapping. Try and have one hand tap 3 evenly-spaced times whilst the other does 4. No pauses, no skipping beats: One hand doing three equal beats for every four equally-spaced beats that the other hand does.

I'm told that, if you really work on it for a long time, you can eventually make this work. It actually requires you to effectively re-wire your brain: Your brain ties every move it makes into its 'clock', and for good reason - when you walk, for instance, you really don't want your left leg to move out of sequence with the right.

To be able to do a 3:4 tapping sequence, you need to actually create a second 'clock' that your brain can tie into: something it neither evolved to do, nor has any convincing reason to learn to do in normal life.

The only person I know who even claims to have met anyone who's done it is a martial arts nut who claims it makes you able to do attacks faster if you can begin one attack with one hand before you've finished the attack of the other. I can kind of see his point.. but not enough to make the effort to try and do it myself.

I can't remember what started me thinking about this whole topic.. but it's vaguely interesting to try and catch when your brain is slaving your movements to its internal clock sometimes.

5 comments

sokuban
Comment from: sokuban [Member] Email
That reminds me of this challenge my high school music teacher gave to us all. If you could clap to a 120bpm (or something like that, I forget the actual number) offbeat with a metronome, he'd treat you to yakiniku.

Now, I thought, ok, that sounds easy! I mean, I can easily clap to a 120bpm on the beat so it's definitely physically possible, now I just need to clap in between the beats instead of on the beat.

It was actually pretty damn hard! Your brain automatically makes you want to synchronize with the onbeat instead of the offbeat and then you lose your time. And obviously if you don't listen to the metronome then it's impossible to keep a straight 120bpm beat.

According to my teacher he made the contest as a joke and didn't expect anyone to ever be able to do it, but one year a long time ago a really good percussionist was able to do it and he actually had to treat him to yakiniku.
25/02/11 @ 01:38
Kaotik4266
Comment from: Kaotik4266 [Visitor]
I'm a muso, so a lot of this sort of thing is fairly straightforward for me, but geez, the simultaneous triplets/quavers is hard! I even tried it with a metronome going and I couldn't do it!
*challenge accepted*
Actually, once you plug it into Sibelius and realise what it sounds like, it's not hard at all! It's just this: http://www.kaotik4266.co.cc/clapping.mid (high tone is one hand, low tone is the other)
Of course, learning the pattern like that negates the whole dual clock problem but it's good for showing off! :D
25/02/11 @ 10:14
oneandoneis2
Comment from: oneandoneis2 [Member] · http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/
Heh. I was expecting to get accused of trolling by writing a "Bet you can't sit tapping your hands" post - glad to see it's been found interesting :)
01/03/11 @ 08:48
Benjamin Cahill
Comment from: Benjamin Cahill [Visitor] · http://benjamincahill.com/
What? Seriously?

I do 2:3 and 3:4 all the time, and they are both ridiculously easy. Granted, I am a musician, but still...come on...it's just math. Look here:

1..45.7.90..

Like this:
ONE two three FOUR FIVE six SEVEN eight NINE TEN eleven twelve

That's all there is to it. You make it sound like something impossible. 0.o
25/04/11 @ 06:07
oneandoneis2
Comment from: oneandoneis2 [Member] · http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/
Congratulations! You completely missed the point of the entire article. Well done!
25/04/11 @ 09:59

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)
 

[Links][icon] My links

[Icon][Icon] I'm in the Perl newsletter again. I should try and write about some other language...
21/05/12

[Icon][Icon] Facebook Syndication Error
22/05/12

[Icon][Icon] I last listened to:
Johann Pachelbel - Canon in D major

[Icon][Icon] Most recent photo:
js.js

[Icon][Icon]About Me

[Icon][Icon]About this blog

[Icon][Icon]My LQ profile

[Icon][Icon]My /. profile

[Icon][Icon]My Wishlist

[Icon]MyCommerce

[FSF Associate Member]


May 2012
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Search

User tools

XML Feeds

eXTReMe Tracker

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Valid CSS!

[Valid RSS feed]

powered by b2evolution